Search for: "WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 11:08 am
In Westport Ins. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 10:37 am
In other words, if there are five people who all suffered a serious personal injury in a Boston car accident, the most the insurance company will pay is $50,000, so you want to make sure you file a claim in a timely manner. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:47 am
Employers Reinsurance Company, now known as Westport Insurance Corporation (“Westport”), provided reinsurance coverage for insurance policies issued by Connecticut Specialty Insurance Company (the “Reinsurance Agreement”). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:47 am
Employers Reinsurance Company, now known as Westport Insurance Corporation (“Westport”), provided reinsurance coverage for insurance policies issued by Connecticut Specialty Insurance Company (the “Reinsurance Agreement”). [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Westport Insurance Corp., 1:14-cv-00151 (USDC W.D. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:42 am
In Westport Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 11:29 am
Chapter 93A, if a court finds that an insurance company willfully or knowingly employed unfair and deceptive claims settlement practices, then an injured party can recover double or even triple their damages from the insurance company. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:03 am
January 5, 2010) Plaintiff’s predecessor, Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“Royal Surplus”) entered into an agreement pursuant to which it assumed the liabilities and acquired the related assets of Connecticut Specialty Insurance’s Company (“Connecticut Specialty”) covered business as of December 31, 2001. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
In Westport Ins. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:21 am
October 8, 2010) Plaintiff’s predecessor, Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“Royal Surplus”) entered into an agreement pursuant to which it assumed the liabilities and acquired the related assets of Connecticut Specialty Insurance’s Company (“Connecticut Specialty”) covered business as of December 31, 2001. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
In that case, Equity Residential argued that a policy issued to it by Arrowood Surplus Lines Insurance Company had a three-year period and sought coverage for losses that occurred from December 15, 1999 to December 15, 2002. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:55 am
I mean, sure, it totally matters to the relevant insurance companies. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:09 am
Here, in Executive Risk Indemnity v, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, we see Justice Jone's decision on this issue: "We are asked to determine, under Pennsylvania law, whether excess insurers Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, based upon their prior knowledge exclusions, and Continental Casualty Company, based upon rescission of its policies, were entitled to summary judgment declaring that they have no obligation to indemnify… [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:34 am
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORP. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:30 am
Westport Insurance Corporation, No. 13-2880 2014 W.L. 1674112 (3d Cir. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:15 am
According to the report, labor officials issued stop work orders to 19 construction companies working at six different sites in Westport. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
In 2006, the Arrudas sought permission from the Westport zoning board to enlarge the convenience store by encapsulating the space then reserved for the beauty shop and the insurance company. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
This also reduced the company's insurance premiums, the newspaper reports. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 3:50 am
(Westport Insurance Corp. v Mylonas et al., case number 2:14-cv-05760, in the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
Here, in Executive Risk Indemnity v, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, we see Justice Jone's decision on this issue: "We are asked to determine, under Pennsylvania law, whether excess insurers Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, based upon their prior knowledge exclusions, and Continental Casualty Company, based upon rescission of its policies, were entitled to summary judgment declaring that they have no obligation to indemnify… [read post]
